- NotSo9to5
- Posts
- Your Job Search Is Taking Longer Because You're Being Too Picky
Your Job Search Is Taking Longer Because You're Being Too Picky
When high standards become the problem
INSIDE THIS ISSUE:
Why filtering out too much keeps you unemployed
This week's hot & vetted remote job picks
The difference between standards and perfectionism
What actually matters vs. what you think matters
When to compromise and when not to
Hi Freedom Seeker,
You've been job searching for months. You see positions come up, but most of them aren't quite right.
Wrong salary range. Unclear job description. Company you've never heard of. Benefits that aren't perfect. Role that's 80% what you want but not 100%.
So you skip them and keep waiting for the perfect opportunity.
Here's the problem: You're filtering out so many jobs that you're barely applying to anything. And the few "perfect" ones you do apply to? So is everyone else.
Sometimes the issue isn't that you can't find a job. It's that you're being too picky about which ones are worth your time.
🚀 Weekly Vetted Remote Job Picks
1️⃣ Company: Pomelo
🔷 Role: Video Editor
🔷 Location: USA
🔷 Type: Full-time, fully remote
🔷 Perks: Flexible hours, competitive benefits package
🔷 Salary: Competitive
➡️ Apply Here
2️⃣ Company: Array
🔷 Role: Account Executive
🔷 Location: Canada, US
🔷 Type: Full-time, fully remote
🔷 Perks: Summer Fridays, unlimited PTO
🔷 Salary: $100,000 (base salary)
➡️ Apply Here
3️⃣ Company: Typeform
🔷 Role: Product Designer
🔷 Location: Europe
🔷 Type: Full-time, fully remote
🔷 Perks: Remote-first culture, flexible hours
🔷 Salary: Competitive
➡️ Apply Here
WHERE PICKY BECOMES A PROBLEM
YOU'RE WAITING FOR 100% MATCHES
Job has 8 out of 10 things you want? You skip it because it's missing two.
The problem: Almost no job will check every single box. You're eliminating good opportunities waiting for perfect ones that barely exist.
YOU'RE FILTERING BY COMPANY BRAND
Only applying to companies you've heard of or that look impressive on a resume. Ignoring smaller companies, startups, or less-known brands.
The problem: Famous companies get 500+ applications. Unknown companies get 50. Your odds are way better at places nobody's heard of.
YOU'RE STUCK ON A SPECIFIC SALARY NUMBER
Won't consider anything below $X, even if it's close or the role has other benefits.
The problem: If you've been unemployed for 6 months, taking a job $5K below your target is still better than staying unemployed another 3 months.
YOU'RE AVOIDING ANYTHING IMPERFECT
Job description is vague? Skip. Benefits aren't amazing? Skip. Role is slightly different from what you've done? Skip.
The problem: You're creating so many disqualifying factors that nothing makes it through your filter.
Here’s What MATTERS
DEALBREAKERS VS. PREFERENCES
Dealbreakers: Things that would make you miserable or won't work logistically.
Can't work required hours due to timezone
Salary genuinely can't cover your bills
Role requires skills you absolutely don't have
Preferences: Things you want but could live without.
Perfect benefits package
Exciting company mission
Brand-name recognition
If you're treating preferences like dealbreakers, you're being too picky.
THE 70% RULE
If a job hits 70% of what you're looking for, apply. Don't wait for 100%.
You can figure out the other 30% in the interview. Maybe those things are negotiable. Maybe they matter less than you think once you learn more.
GOOD ENOUGH IS SOMETIMES GOOD ENOUGH
The perfect job doesn't exist. Every role has downsides.
Taking a good job now beats waiting 6 more months for a perfect one that might not come.
WHEN TO BE PICKY VS. WHEN TO COMPROMISE
BE PICKY ABOUT:
Company values that conflict with yours
Roles that would make you genuinely unhappy
Red flags that signal toxic environment
Situations where you'd be set up to fail
COMPROMISE ON:
Company size or brand recognition
Perfect benefits package
Exact salary target (within reason)
Job title or level if the work itself is right
Industry prestige
You can be selective without eliminating everything that isn't perfect.
THE REALITY CHECK
If you've been searching for 4+ months and barely applying because nothing meets your standards, your standards might be the problem.
Not always. Sometimes the market is tough or your field is limited. But often, people are gatekeeping themselves out of opportunities that would've been fine.
The question isn't "Is this job perfect?"
It's "Is this job better than being unemployed for another few months?"
If the answer is yes, stop filtering it out.
STUCK IN ANALYSIS PARALYSIS?
The 1:1 Job Search Partnership helps you figure out what actually matters vs. what you're overthinking.
I’ll personally look at the jobs you're skipping and identify which filters are helping you vs. which are just keeping you unemployed longer. Sometimes you need someone outside your own head to reality-check your standards.
Here's what I do:
✅ Review your filtering criteria and identify what's too restrictive
✅ Help you prioritize dealbreakers vs. nice-to-haves
✅ Expand your target roles to include realistic options you're missing
✅ Build application strategy that balances quality and volume
Most people realize they've been ruling out jobs that would've been perfectly fine. I help you see which ones are actually worth applying to.
Reply with "HELP ME OUT" and let's figure out if you're being selective or just stuck.
Until next week,
Sami
P.S. Every month you stay unemployed waiting for the perfect job costs you more than accepting a good-enough job and keeping your eyes open for better. Do the math on what pickiness is actually costing you.
Interested in getting your product/ remote job offering in front of highly engaged remote workers?