• NotSo9to5
  • Posts
  • Your Job Search Is Taking Longer Because You're Being Too Picky

Your Job Search Is Taking Longer Because You're Being Too Picky

When high standards become the problem

INSIDE THIS ISSUE:

  • Why filtering out too much keeps you unemployed

  • This week's hot & vetted remote job picks

  • The difference between standards and perfectionism

  • What actually matters vs. what you think matters

  • When to compromise and when not to

Hi Freedom Seeker,

You've been job searching for months. You see positions come up, but most of them aren't quite right.

Wrong salary range. Unclear job description. Company you've never heard of. Benefits that aren't perfect. Role that's 80% what you want but not 100%.

So you skip them and keep waiting for the perfect opportunity.

Here's the problem: You're filtering out so many jobs that you're barely applying to anything. And the few "perfect" ones you do apply to? So is everyone else.

Sometimes the issue isn't that you can't find a job. It's that you're being too picky about which ones are worth your time.


🚀 Weekly Vetted Remote Job Picks

1️⃣ Company: Pomelo

🔷 Role: Video Editor

🔷 Location: USA

🔷 Type: Full-time, fully remote

🔷 Perks: Flexible hours, competitive benefits package

🔷 Salary: Competitive   

➡️ Apply Here

2️⃣ Company: Array

🔷 Role: Account Executive

🔷 Location: Canada, US

🔷 Type: Full-time, fully remote

🔷 Perks: Summer Fridays, unlimited PTO

🔷 Salary: $100,000 (base salary)

➡️ Apply Here

3️⃣ Company: Typeform

🔷 Role: Product Designer

🔷 Location: Europe

🔷 Type: Full-time, fully remote

🔷 Perks: Remote-first culture, flexible hours

🔷 Salary: Competitive

➡️ Apply Here

WHERE PICKY BECOMES A PROBLEM

YOU'RE WAITING FOR 100% MATCHES

Job has 8 out of 10 things you want? You skip it because it's missing two.

The problem: Almost no job will check every single box. You're eliminating good opportunities waiting for perfect ones that barely exist.

YOU'RE FILTERING BY COMPANY BRAND

Only applying to companies you've heard of or that look impressive on a resume. Ignoring smaller companies, startups, or less-known brands.

The problem: Famous companies get 500+ applications. Unknown companies get 50. Your odds are way better at places nobody's heard of.

YOU'RE STUCK ON A SPECIFIC SALARY NUMBER

Won't consider anything below $X, even if it's close or the role has other benefits.

The problem: If you've been unemployed for 6 months, taking a job $5K below your target is still better than staying unemployed another 3 months.

YOU'RE AVOIDING ANYTHING IMPERFECT

Job description is vague? Skip. Benefits aren't amazing? Skip. Role is slightly different from what you've done? Skip.

The problem: You're creating so many disqualifying factors that nothing makes it through your filter.

Here’s What MATTERS

DEALBREAKERS VS. PREFERENCES

Dealbreakers: Things that would make you miserable or won't work logistically.

  • Can't work required hours due to timezone

  • Salary genuinely can't cover your bills

  • Role requires skills you absolutely don't have

Preferences: Things you want but could live without.

  • Perfect benefits package

  • Exciting company mission

  • Brand-name recognition

If you're treating preferences like dealbreakers, you're being too picky.

THE 70% RULE

If a job hits 70% of what you're looking for, apply. Don't wait for 100%.

You can figure out the other 30% in the interview. Maybe those things are negotiable. Maybe they matter less than you think once you learn more.

GOOD ENOUGH IS SOMETIMES GOOD ENOUGH

The perfect job doesn't exist. Every role has downsides.

Taking a good job now beats waiting 6 more months for a perfect one that might not come.

WHEN TO BE PICKY VS. WHEN TO COMPROMISE

BE PICKY ABOUT:

  • Company values that conflict with yours

  • Roles that would make you genuinely unhappy

  • Red flags that signal toxic environment

  • Situations where you'd be set up to fail

COMPROMISE ON:

  • Company size or brand recognition

  • Perfect benefits package

  • Exact salary target (within reason)

  • Job title or level if the work itself is right

  • Industry prestige

You can be selective without eliminating everything that isn't perfect.

THE REALITY CHECK

If you've been searching for 4+ months and barely applying because nothing meets your standards, your standards might be the problem.

Not always. Sometimes the market is tough or your field is limited. But often, people are gatekeeping themselves out of opportunities that would've been fine.

The question isn't "Is this job perfect?"

It's "Is this job better than being unemployed for another few months?"

If the answer is yes, stop filtering it out.

STUCK IN ANALYSIS PARALYSIS?

The 1:1 Job Search Partnership helps you figure out what actually matters vs. what you're overthinking.

I’ll personally look at the jobs you're skipping and identify which filters are helping you vs. which are just keeping you unemployed longer. Sometimes you need someone outside your own head to reality-check your standards.

Here's what I do:
✅ Review your filtering criteria and identify what's too restrictive
✅ Help you prioritize dealbreakers vs. nice-to-haves
✅ Expand your target roles to include realistic options you're missing
✅ Build application strategy that balances quality and volume

Most people realize they've been ruling out jobs that would've been perfectly fine. I help you see which ones are actually worth applying to.

Reply with "HELP ME OUT" and let's figure out if you're being selective or just stuck.

Until next week,
Sami

P.S. Every month you stay unemployed waiting for the perfect job costs you more than accepting a good-enough job and keeping your eyes open for better. Do the math on what pickiness is actually costing you.

Interested in getting your product/ remote job offering in front of highly engaged remote workers?